Reawards for Injustice with Innocent Hindus By Hindus Times Proxy war

आखिरकार 26/11 के जिंदा आतंकी मोहम्मद अजमल आमिर कसाब का फांसी सर्वोच्च न्यायलय ने बरक़रार रखा है, परन्तु कांग्रेस और उनके सहयोगी दलों के वोट-बैंक की राजनीति के वजह से फांसी कब उसे मिलेगी ये कोई नहीं बता सकता | मोहम्मद अजमल आमिर कसाब  के आतंकवादी करतूतों के मास्टरमाइंड एवं नाजाइज अब्बू हाफिज़ मोहम्मद सईद(सूअर) को कब भारत लाया जाएगा ये भी किसी को नहीं पता...!!! इस सूअर पर संयुक्त राष्ट्र और  अमरीका ने अन्तराष्ट्रीय आतंकवाद क़ानून के तहत वांछित तथा इस सूअर पर $10 मिल्लीयन यानी रु.55.685 करोड़ इनाम घोषित किया है...!!! पोर्किस्तान मे आज भी ये ओसामा के तर्ज पर ऐश-ओ-आराम से रह रहा है...!!! वन्देमातरम, जय-हिंद, जय-भारत...!!!

More photos from dharmendra nair

yogesh saxena09:59EditHindustan

आखिरकार 26/11 के जिंदा आतंकी मोहम्मद अजमल आमिर कसाब का फांसी सर्वोच्च न्यायलय ने बरक़रार रखा है, परन्तु कांग्रेस और उनके सहयोगी दलों के वोट-बैंक की राजनीति के वजह से फांसी कब उसे मिलेगी ये कोई नहीं बता सकता | मोहम्मद अजमल आमिर कसाब  के आतंकवादी करतूतों के मास्टरमाइंड एवं नाजाइज अब्बू हाफिज़ मोहम्मद सईद(सूअर) को कब भारत लाया जाएगा ये भी किसी को नहीं पता...!!! इस सूअर पर संयुक्त राष्ट्र और  अमरीका ने अन्तराष्ट्रीय आतंकवाद क़ानून के तहत वांछित तथा इस सूअर पर $10 मिल्लीयन यानी रु.55.685 करोड़ इनाम घोषित किया है...!!! पोर्किस्तान मे आज भी ये ओसामा के तर्ज पर ऐश-ओ-आराम से रह रहा है...!!! वन्देमातरम, जय-हिंद, जय-भारत...!!!

More photos from dharmendra nair

yogesh saxena09:59EditHindustan Times, a Proxy Media representative to terrorism promulgations working on the behest of such alien powers, who have submerged the national interest to naught for patriotic citizen of Bharat Varsh. The news flashed out on the Basis of Detail investigation Conducted By Military Committee proving innocence to Lt Con. Purohit having been under the preventive detention on the Grave yards of Hindus Sentiments has not been taken Care, while this Hindustan Times has started suggesting the followers of the pursuit of Jihad on the behest of Fanatics Taliban to misuse the power of Judiciary in favour of such henious Convict of death sentence to utilise the Anglo Saxon Jurisprudence Judicial Institution, which should have carved out that LAW SHOULD LIBERATE, BUT NOT ENSLAVES. It should have been written by looking to the Conditions of HINDUS IN PAKISTAN and BANGLA DESH being onslaught by devisive forces , the treatment given to Osama Bin Laden, Saddam and Gaddafi, as per the perceptions of Sheriat Criminal Law must be Given to Kashab and Afzal. The Hindustan times writes on front page that Kasab still afyer waging War against our mother land can file review plea in supreme court and if it is rejected can file Curative petitionand there after petition under Article 32 before Supreme Court for not having fair trial and than mercy plea again to President of India and there after take the plea of delay in execution of verdict and pendency of mercy Appeal before president of India. What a Anglo Saxon Jurisprudence, where law does Talk in case of General V.K.Singh Date Of Birth row  on one hand the issue of Lt Col Prasad Shrikant Purohit is a key player in the narrative of Hindutva terror. Believed to be the man at the heart of the extremist Hindu militia Abhinav Bharat, he was arrested by the Maharashtra Anti-Terror Squad (ATS) on November 5, 2008, for his role in the Malegaon blast on September 29 that year. On April 13, 2009, the Indian army instituted a court of inquiry (COI) against Purohit and four other army personnel. This, even as a national investigation into saffron terror continues and a criminal case is pending in a special MCOCA court in Mumbai.
The army’s inquiry having come to an end, the board of officers, comprising three senior army personnel—a brigadier and two colonels—has forwarded its findings to the Southern Command. Close to 60 officers were examined as witnesses over a period of 37 months. Outlook has gained exclusive access to the testimonies of all the witnesses. These reveal that Purohit will in all likelihood be held guilty for his association with organisations not recognised under the army. However, he may very well get a clean chit as far as being involved in activity that could be termed “terrorist” or “anti-national”. This internal inquiry is unlikely to be made public.
Besides Purohit, the COI was convened to look into charges against four other personnel: Lt Col B.P. Dhar, Captain Sood, Major D.P. Sudhir and Subedar Pawar. All of them were linked to Purohit, though he remains the only one behind bars. The terms of reference set for the inquiry were primarily to establish the veracity of six allegations, most of which can be covered under what is known as “dereliction of duty” in army parlance. Purohit has been proceeded against for the following:
For reportedly proceeding on leave or temporary duty without approval from his seniors, thereby absenting himself from duty
For allegedly being a member of Abhinav Bharat, an organisation not recognised by the armed forces of the Union
For the illegal sale of a non-service pattern weapon
For having initiated procedures to get bulletproof jackets, debugging equipment and mini bug detectors for personal gains using his official position
For allegedly swapping ammunition from the army
For allegedly being involved in illegal or undesirable terrorist activity.
The last ground for investigating Purohit would suggest the army is also looking into the Malegaon blast case. In reality, however, the force is looking only into his antecedents. As Rohini Salian, special public prosecutor of NIA, says, “The army inquiry has no bearing on the case before the special judge. These are two completely different investigations done by two completely different agencies.”
None of the 60 witnesses before the COI, Outlook has learnt, has corroborated the charge of Purohit being a terrorist. Several witnesses have instead used epithets like “motivated officer” and “good field operator” for him. His peers too reportedly describe him as an officer who could cultivate sources with ease. Sudhakar Chaturvedi was one such source he was cultivating, according to the argument being presented; it was he who led him to Abhinav Bharat.
This version is at odds with the ATS’s allegation of Purohit being Abhinav Bharat’s leader. In the picture that emerges from the COI testimonies, Sudhakar, currently an accused in the case, worked for Abhinav Bharat and kept feeding Purohit inputs on the right-wing group’s movements during the latter’s tenure as an intelligence officer of the Deolali unit in Maharashtra. Gradually, he became a key source and shortcut for Purohit to infiltrate right-wing groups. After Purohit was posted to Pachmarhi in Madhya Pradesh, he handed over the “source” to his unit, handled for a short while by the now retired Subedar Pawar. The Constitutional Debate regarding protection of Hindus in Pakistan in case of Attrocities by treating the Muslims similarily in our Nation, but Hindus are Slaughtered ruth lessly like Our HOLY Cow but Butchers are having Protection. Supreme Court will never Look towards the implementation of 13 Judges Judgement in TMA pai Case, 7 Judges Judges Prohibiting Cow Progeny Slauters, Fraud on Adentity on MONUMENTS made buy Hindus, but Protect Kasab and Afzal and Also to Tata and Manu Singhvi in Sex Scandel, While Justice U.C.Banerjee halds that Godhra was Suicide Committed By Ram Bakt at Gujrat.

Times, a Proxy Media representative to terrorism promulgations working on the behest of such alien powers, who have submerged the national interest to naught for patriotic citizen of Bharat Varsh. The news flashed out on the Basis of Detail investigation Conducted By Military Committee proving innocence to Lt Con. Purohit having been under the preventive detention on the Grave yards of Hindus Sentiments has not been taken Care, while this Hindustan Times has started suggesting the followers of the pursuit of Jihad on the behest of Fanatics Taliban to misuse the power of Judiciary in favour of such henious Convict of death sentence to utilise the Anglo Saxon Jurisprudence Judicial Institution, which should have carved out that LAW SHOULD LIBERATE, BUT NOT ENSLAVES. It should have been written by looking to the Conditions of HINDUS IN PAKISTAN and BANGLA DESH being onslaught by devisive forces , the treatment given to Osama Bin Laden, Saddam and Gaddafi, as per the perceptions of Sheriat Criminal Law must be Given to Kashab and Afzal. The Hindustan times writes on front page that Kasab still afyer waging War against our mother land can file review plea in supreme court and if it is rejected can file Curative petitionand there after petition under Article 32 before Supreme Court for not having fair trial and than mercy plea again to President of India and there after take the plea of delay in execution of verdict and pendency of mercy Appeal before president of India. What a Anglo Saxon Jurisprudence, where law does Talk in case of General V.K.Singh Date Of Birth row  on one hand the issue of Lt Col Prasad Shrikant Purohit is a key player in the narrative of Hindutva terror. Believed to be the man at the heart of the extremist Hindu militia Abhinav Bharat, he was arrested by the Maharashtra Anti-Terror Squad (ATS) on November 5, 2008, for his role in the Malegaon blast on September 29 that year. On April 13, 2009, the Indian army instituted a court of inquiry (COI) against Purohit and four other army personnel. This, even as a national investigation into saffron terror continues and a criminal case is pending in a special MCOCA court in Mumbai.
The army’s inquiry having come to an end, the board of officers, comprising three senior army personnel—a brigadier and two colonels—has forwarded its findings to the Southern Command. Close to 60 officers were examined as witnesses over a period of 37 months. Outlook has gained exclusive access to the testimonies of all the witnesses. These reveal that Purohit will in all likelihood be held guilty for his association with organisations not recognised under the army. However, he may very well get a clean chit as far as being involved in activity that could be termed “terrorist” or “anti-national”. This internal inquiry is unlikely to be made public.
Besides Purohit, the COI was convened to look into charges against four other personnel: Lt Col B.P. Dhar, Captain Sood, Major D.P. Sudhir and Subedar Pawar. All of them were linked to Purohit, though he remains the only one behind bars. The terms of reference set for the inquiry were primarily to establish the veracity of six allegations, most of which can be covered under what is known as “dereliction of duty” in army parlance. Purohit has been proceeded against for the following:
For reportedly proceeding on leave or temporary duty without approval from his seniors, thereby absenting himself from duty
For allegedly being a member of Abhinav Bharat, an organisation not recognised by the armed forces of the Union
For the illegal sale of a non-service pattern weapon
For having initiated procedures to get bulletproof jackets, debugging equipment and mini bug detectors for personal gains using his official position
For allegedly swapping ammunition from the army
For allegedly being involved in illegal or undesirable terrorist activity.
The last ground for investigating Purohit would suggest the army is also looking into the Malegaon blast case. In reality, however, the force is looking only into his antecedents. As Rohini Salian, special public prosecutor of NIA, says, “The army inquiry has no bearing on the case before the special judge. These are two completely different investigations done by two completely different agencies.”
None of the 60 witnesses before the COI, Outlook has learnt, has corroborated the charge of Purohit being a terrorist. Several witnesses have instead used epithets like “motivated officer” and “good field operator” for him. His peers too reportedly describe him as an officer who could cultivate sources with ease. Sudhakar Chaturvedi was one such source he was cultivating, according to the argument being presented; it was he who led him to Abhinav Bharat.
This version is at odds with the ATS’s allegation of Purohit being Abhinav Bharat’s leader. In the picture that emerges from the COI testimonies, Sudhakar, currently an accused in the case, worked for Abhinav Bharat and kept feeding Purohit inputs on the right-wing group’s movements during the latter’s tenure as an intelligence officer of the Deolali unit in Maharashtra. Gradually, he became a key source and shortcut for Purohit to infiltrate right-wing groups. After Purohit was posted to Pachmarhi in Madhya Pradesh, he handed over the “source” to his unit, handled for a short while by the now retired Subedar Pawar. The Constitutional Debate regarding protection of Hindus in Pakistan in case of Attrocities by treating the Muslims similarily in our Nation, but Hindus are Slaughtered ruth lessly like Our HOLY Cow but Butchers are having Protection. Supreme Court will never Look towards the implementation of 13 Judges Judgement in TMA pai Case, 7 Judges Judges Prohibiting Cow Progeny Slauters, Fraud on Adentity on MONUMENTS made buy Hindus, but Protect Kasab and Afzal and Also to Tata and Manu Singhvi in Sex Scandel, While Justice U.C.Banerjee halds that Godhra was Suicide Committed By Ram Bakt at Gujrat.